Martin Peikert
martin.peikert@epfl.ch +41 21 693 38 46
Nationalité: Swiss / Canadian
Directors
Prof. Paolo Tombesi (FAR)Prof. Nicola Braghieri (LAPIS)
EPFL ENAC IA FAR
BP 4242 (Bâtiment BP)
Station 16
1015 Lausanne
Web site: Site web: https://far.epfl.ch/
Biographie
Martin Peikert is Phd Student and assistant at EPFL at the Laboratory of Construction and Architecture (FAR) under the supervision of Prof. Paolo Tombesi and Prof. Nicola Braghieri. He holds a Master’s degree in Architecture (EIA ,CH / ChibaU, JP) and a Master’s degree in geography (University of Lausanne). He completed his master thesis in 2023 entitled « Structure of the Cultural Production Field of the Swiss Architecture Competition: Identification and Discussion of Inclusion/Exclusion Dynamics. » Under the supervision of Prof. Jean Ruegg. He participated in multiple competitions as lead project designer and worked in the public sector as a city-planner.Martin Peikert is currently in course of creating "The Swiss panel of architecture competition" database regrouping the participation data for more than 10 years of open and selective procedures. He participated as a speaker for the "Wettbwerbslabor 2025" organized by the journal "Hochparterre" and the collective "Now, What, If?" in Zürich.
Parcours professionnel
Architect-City planner
Service des Constructions et de l'Aménagement (SeCA)
State of Fribourg
2023
Architect-Juror
Concours d'architecture
Private institutions
2022-now
Teacher
Physical/ social geography
Gymnase
2019-2023
Freelance architect
Lead team designer
Freelance
2018-2023
Draftsman
Apprenticeship
Pont12
2008-2012
Formation
Géographe-Urbaniste
Master of Arts
Université de Lausanne (CH)
2020-2023
Architecte
Master of Arts
HEIA (CH)/ Chiba University (JP)
2016-2018
Architecte
Bachelor of Arts
HEIA, Fribourg (CH)
2013-2016
Maturité Fédérale
Maturité Professionnelle
ERACOM, Lausanne (CH)
2012-2013
Dessinateur-architecte
Certificat Fédéral de Compétences
CEPM, Morges (CH)
2008-2012
Publications
Sélection de publications
M. Peikert, V. Bovay Tracé |
Concours d’architecture: comment la position influence la pratique |
M. Peikert, P. Valsongiacomo Archi |
Il concorso attraverso la lente della sociologia |
M. Peikert, K. Benjamin, T. Kuny In peer-review process |
Architecture competition in Switzerland: A quantitative investigation into procedure outcomes |
Recherche
The Swiss Competition system: A quantitative analy
The Swiss competition system is characterized by three distinct features that set it apart: (1) it is entirely open to foreign practitioners; (2) it mandates anonymity for all candidates throughout the decision-making process conducted by the jury; and (3) all data related to these procedures is public and easily accessible to the general public.This unique procedural design serves a specific purpose: to allocate contracts and reward architects based on the quality of their work rather than their identity. The procedure is crafted to avoid favoritism or the potential for influential actors to secure contracts through their networks or symbolic capital. The goals of anonymity and equal treatment among candidates are intended to ensure that participants enter the competition on equal footing, with an equal chance of success. But can this claim withstand empirical scrutiny? Can we affirm today that a procedural design that has remained structurally unchanged for over a century still meets the inclusion, quality, and opportunity standards of the contemporary architectural profession?
The SIA 142/143 norms, which govern open and preselection procedures, provide directives on how a competition should be organized and conducted up to the jury’s recommendation for contract attribution. However, these regulations are exclusively operational; they do not include tools to audit, observe, or evaluate the long-term effects of these procedures, their evolution over time, or the resource disparities they may generate among practitioners. Consequently, it is currently impossible to determine through reliable statistical or qualitative observation whether the system operates in alignment with its founding values and principles. The profession has, in effect, organized its own ignorance about the institution of the competition.
In a professional context characterized by the absence of strategic data for modeling success rates or assessing impacts, there is no way to determine whether the market is genuinely open and inclusive or whether it resembles an oligopolistic system. Such an environment fosters representations based solely on personal experience, leading to perceptions skewed by the observer's position: winners see a functional system requiring only minor adjustments, while others list the flaws rendering the process unfair and call for structural reform.
The doctoral research aims to provide the profession with an opportunity to challenge its assumptions through empirical statistical materials. It proposes a hypothetico-deductive analysis to identify the key determinants of procedural outcomes, should they exist.